Keywords
til modellari
katta til modellari
pragmatik xulosa
implikatura
presuppozitsiya
kontekst
kommunikativ maqsad
How to Cite
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada til modellarining kontekstga bog‘liq yashirin ma’noni anglash jarayonida namoyon bo‘ladigan pragmatik xulosa chiqarish qobiliyati kompyuter lingvistikasi nuqtayi nazaridan tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotning asosiy maqsadi pragmatik xulosaning shakllanishiga ta’sir etuvchi lingvistik omillarni aniqlash hamda ularning til modellarida qay darajada aks etishini nazariy jihatdan asoslashdan iborat. Tadqiqotda ingliz va o‘zbek tillaridagi kontekstli birliklar, xususan darajali implikatura, presuppozitsiya, nutqiy maqsad, kontekstga bog‘liq ma’no va muqobil ifodalar tahlil materiali sifatida ko‘rib chiqiladi. Xalqaro tadqiqotlarda taklif etilgan yondashuvlar asosida pragmatik xulosani shakllantiruvchi leksik, sintaktik, semantik va kontekstual omillar tizimlashtiriladi. Tahlil natijalari pragmatik qobiliyatni faqat yakuniy javobning to‘g‘riligi orqali baholash yetarli emasligini ko‘rsatadi.References
1. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). Academic Press.
2. Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Blackwell.
3. Birner, B. J. (2013). Introduction to Pragmatics. Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Hu, J., Levy, R., Degen, J., Schuster, S. (2023). Expectations over unspoken alternatives predict pragmatic inferences. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11, 885-901. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00579.
5. Cho, Y.-e., Kim, S. M. (2024). Pragmatic inference of scalar implicature by LLMs. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Student Research Workshop, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-srw.2. 5. Ma, B., Li, Y., Zhou, W., Gong, Z., Liu, Y. J., Jasinskaja, K., Friedrich, A., Hirschberg, J., Kreuter, F., Plank, B. (2025). Pragmatics in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey on Datasets, Evaluation, Opportunities and Challenges. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1, 8679-8696. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.425. 7. Veitsman, Y., Hartmann, M. (2025). Recent Advancements and Challenges of Turkic Central Asian Language Processing. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Language Models for Low-Resource Languages, 309-324. Association for Computational Linguistics. 8. Minniqulov, I. (2024). Generation of Implicature via Conditional Constructions in English and Uzbek (on the Example of Violation of Maxim of Manner). Philology Matters, 49(2), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.36078/987654993. 9. Chen, X., Wang, S. (2025). Pragmatic Inference Chain (PIC) Improving LLMs’ Reasoning of Authentic Implicit Toxic Language. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 5826-5841. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.296.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.