Keywords
kommunikativ strategiyalar
lingvopragmatika
nutqiy aktlar
xushmuomalilik
pragmatik kompetensiya
qiyosiy-
How to Cite
Abstract
Mazkur maqolada hunarmandchilik diskursida qo‘llaniladigan kommunikativ strategiyalarning ingliz va o‘zbek tillaridagi pragmatik xususiyatlari qiyosiy-kontrastiv nuqtayi nazardan tadqiq etiladi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi hunarmandchilik diskursida namoyon bo‘ladigan asosiy kommunikativ strategiyalarni aniqlash, ularning til vositalari orqali ifodalanishini tahlil qilish hamda ingliz va o‘zbek tilli muloqot madaniyatidagi o‘xshash va farqli jihatlarni yoritishdan iborat. Metodologik asos sifatida diskurs tahlili, lingvopragmatika va qiyosiy-kontrastiv tilshunoslik tamoyillariga tayanildi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, hunarmandchilik diskursida yo‘naltiruvchi, tushuntiruvchi, ishontiruvchi va baholovchi strategiyalar yetakchi o‘rin tutadi. Ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida bu strategiyalarning umumiy mantiqi o‘xshash bo‘lsa-da, ularning til vositalari orqali amalga oshirilishida sezilarli tipologik va madaniy farqlar kuzatiladi. Ayniqsa, xushmuomalilikning ifodalanish darajasi va ishontirish asosi (an’anaga yoki texnik sifatga tayanish) bo‘yicha ikki til o‘rtasida tizimli tafovutlar aniqlandi.References
[1] Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Turapova, M. (2026). Contrastive analysis of politeness strategies in English and Uzbek. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/18378662
[3] Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.
[4] van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
[5] Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Kecskes, I. (2022). The theoretical framework of intercultural pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884303.004
[7] Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika. O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi.
[8] Mahmudov, N. M. (1984). O‘zbek tilida gapning semantik-sintaktik asimmetriyasi. O‘qituvchi.
[9] Abdisamatov, A. (2025). Linguopragmatic research of craft discourse. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(6), 2157-2160. https://zienjournals.com
[10] Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5(1), 25-66.
[11] Shamsiddinova, M. H. (2025). O‘zbek tilida nutqiy aktlar nazariyasining konseptual asoslarini takomillashtirish usullari. The Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2157-2160.
[12] Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
[13] Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931-952.
[14] Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. Arnold.
[15] Ter-Minasova, S. G. (2000). Yazik i mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya. Slovo.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.