Keywords
sun’iy intellekt
mashina tarjimasi
How to Cite
Abstract
Sun’iy intellekt rivoji zamonaviy mashina tarjimasi texnologiyalariga sezilarli ta’sir ko‘rsatdi. Biroq onomatopik birliklar kabi ekspressiv til birliklarini tarjima qilish ularning semantik va pragmatik xususiyatlari sababli murakkab masala bo‘lib qolmoqda. Mazkur maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek tillaridagi onomatopik birliklarning SI asosidagi mashina tarjimasida qayta ishlanishining lingvopragmatik xususiyatlari tadqiq etiladi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi SI tarjima tizimlarining onomatopik birliklarning semantik, pragmatik va stilistik funksiyalarini saqlash imkoniyatlarini aniqlashdan iborat.References
1. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., Bengio, Y. (2015). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
2. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P.,... Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
3. Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of EMNLP, 1724- 1734.
4. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
5. Koehn, P. (2020). Neural Machine Translation. Cambridge University Press.
6. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998-6008.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.