Keywords
Semantic Compression
Stance Drift
Evaluative Stance
Directive Force
Diplomatic Discourse
English-Uzbek
How to Cite
Abstract
Diplomatic discourse is highly calibrated: people in different institutions regularly manage evaluative stance, directive force and degrees of commitment. In other words, they use a language that shows directly what they want to say or to do However, in consecutive interpreting (CI) note-taking is considered as intentionally non-verbatim and oriented tool toward economy and retrievability. Thus, under such compression, it is believed that small pragmatic markers become more structurally vulnerable and may disappear from the noters [1, p.258].References
[1] Kohn, K., Albl-Mikasa, M. Note-taking in consecutive interpreting. On the reconstruction of an individualised language. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series - Themes in Translation Studies, 1, 257-272 (published online 2021). https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v1i.19
[2] Gile, D. Prise de notes et attention en début d’apprentissage de l’interprétation consécutive - une expérience - démonstration de sensibilisation. Meta, 36(2-3), 431- 439 (1991). https://doi.org/10.7202/002898ar
[3] Arumí Ribas, M. Problems and strategies in consecutive interpreting: A pilot study at two different stages of interpreter training. Meta, 57(3), 812-835 (2012). https://doi.org/10.7202/1017092ar
[4] Gile, D. The Effort Models of Interpreting as a Didactic Construct. In R. Muñoz Martín, S. Sun D. Li (Eds.), Advances in Cognitive Translation Studies (pp. 139-160). Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2070-6_7
[5] Dam, H. V. Interpreters’ notes: On the choice of language. Interpreting, 6(1), 3-17 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.1.03dam
[6] Dam, H. V. From controversy to complexity: Replicating research and extending the evidence on language choice in note-taking for consecutive interpreting. Interpreting, 23(2), 222-244 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00062.dam
[7] Szabó, C. Language choice in note-taking for consecutive interpreting. Interpreting, 8(2), 129-147 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.2.02sza
[8] Abuín González, M. The language of consecutive interpreters’ notes: Differences across levels of expertise. Interpreting, 14(1), 55-72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.1.03abu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.