Keywords
bo‘lajak ingliz tili o‘qituvchisi
kommunikativ kompetensiya
grammatik aniqlik
pragmatik maqbullik
focus on form
vazifaga asoslangan ta’lim
kasbiy-metodik tayyorgarlik.
How to Cite
Abstract
Mazkur maqolada bo‘lajak ingliz tili o‘qituvchilarining kommunikativ grammatik kompetensiyasini rivojlantirishning nazariy, metodik va kasbiy ahamiyati tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot tizimli-nazariy adabiyotlar sharhi, qiyosiy tahlil va pedagogik modellashtirish metodlariga asoslandi. Kommunikativ grammatik kompetensiya grammatik shaklni bilish bilangina cheklanmay, shakl, ma’no va qo‘llanishni real kommunikativ vaziyatda uyg‘unlashtirish qobiliyati sifatida talqin etildi. Tahlil natijasida uning lingvistik aniqlik, mazmuniy muvofiqlik, pragmatik maqbullik, nutqiy ravonlik hamda metodik transfer komponentlaridan iborat integrativ tuzilmasi asoslandi. Shuningdek, kontekstlashtirilgan topshiriqlar, vazifaga asoslangan ta’lim, “focus on form”, reflektiv tahlil, raqamli vositalar va mezonli baholashni uyg‘unlashtiruvchi metodik yo‘nalishlar taklif qilindi. Natijalar bo‘lajak o‘qituvchining shaxsiy nutqiy kompetensiyasi bilan uning grammatikani kommunikativ asosda o‘qita olish salohiyati o‘zaro bog‘liq ekanini ko‘rsatadi.References
1. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
2. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: A literature review. Language Awareness, 12(2), 96–108.https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410308667069
3. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2– 27). Longman.
4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching testing. Applied Linguistics, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
5. Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41–57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020 5639-0_3
6. Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics,
7. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for languages- learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
8. Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512
9. Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
10. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Heinle.
11. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
12. Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge.
13. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
14. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004