“O‘ZBEKISTONNING ENG YANGI TARIXI” FANINI O‘QITISHDA SUN’IY INTELLEKT TEXNOLOGIYALARIDAN FOYDALANISHNING DIDAKTIK ASOSLARI
PDF

Keywords

sun’iy intellekt
tarix ta’limi
didaktik asoslar
TPACK
konnektivizm
konstruktivizm
kognitiv yuklama
adaptiv ta’lim
tarixiy tafakkur
media-savodxonlik.

How to Cite

“O‘ZBEKISTONNING ENG YANGI TARIXI” FANINI O‘QITISHDA SUN’IY INTELLEKT TEXNOLOGIYALARIDAN FOYDALANISHNING DIDAKTIK ASOSLARI. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(09), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.70728/c.series.ped.v08.i09.016

Abstract

Maqolada “O‘zbekistonning eng yangi tarixi” fanini o‘qitishda sun’iy intellekt texnologiyalaridan foydalanishning didaktik asoslari tizimli ravishda tahlil qilindi. Sun’iy intellektning ta’lim jarayonidagi o‘rni konstruktivizm, TPACK, konnektivizm hamda kognitiv yuklama nazariyalari bilan bog‘liq holda asoslandi. Tarix fanining manbashunoslik, tarixiy tafakkur, tanqidiy tahlil va tarbiyaviy yo‘nalishlari hisobga olinib, sun’iy intellekt vositalarini ta’lim mazmuniga integratsiyalashning besh tarkibiy blokdan iborat funksional modeli taklif etildi. Shuningdek, sun’iy intellektdan foydalanishning interfaol-dialogik, adaptiv-individual, vizual-rekonstruktiv, tanqidiy-tahliliy, formativ-baholovchi hamda loyihaviy-tadqiqot yo‘nalishlari yoritildi. Model samaradorligini baholash mezonlari va sun’iy intellektdan foydalanish jarayonida yuzaga kelishi mumkin bo‘lgan pedagogik-etik xavflarni kamaytirish mexanizmlari ham ko‘rsatib berildi.
PDF

References

1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Ta’lim to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. — 2020-yil 23-sentabr, O‘RQ-637-son.

2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Yangi O‘zbekistonning 2022–2026-yillarga mo‘ljallangan Taraqqiyot strategiyasi to‘g‘risida”gi PF-60-son Farmoni. — 2022-yil 28-yanvar.

3. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Sun’iy intellekt texnologiyalarini jadal joriy etish va rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi qarori. — 2021-yil 17-fevral.

4. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. — Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. — P. 79–91.

5. Piaget J. The Psychology of Intelligence. — London: Routledge, 1950.

6. Bruner J. The Process of Education. — Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960. — P. 33.

7. Jonassen D.H. Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. — New York: Routledge, 2011.

8. Papert S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. — New York: Basic Books, 1980.

9. Shulman L.S. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching // Educational Researcher. — 1986. — Vol. 15, No. 2. — P. 4–14.

10. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge // Teachers College Record. — 2006. — Vol. 108, No. 6. — P. 1017–1054.

11. Siemens G. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age // International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. — 2005. — Vol. 2, No. 1. — P. 3–10.

12. Downes S. Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks. — Ottawa: National Research Council Canada, 2012.

13. Sweller J. Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning // Cognitive Science. — 1988. — Vol. 12, No. 2. — P. 257–285.

14. Mayer R.E. Multimedia Learning. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

15. Paas F., van Merriënboer J.J.G. Cognitive Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks // Current Directions in Psychological Science. — 2020. — Vol. 29, No. 4. — P. 394–398.

16. Wineburg S. Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past. — Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001. — P. 3–27.

17. Seixas P., Morton T. The Big Six Historical Thinking Concepts. — Toronto: Nelson Education, 2013.

18. Levesque S. Thinking Historically: Educating Students for the Twenty-First Century. — Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. — P. 21–45.

19. Holmes W., Bialik M., Fadel C. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. — Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, 2019. — P. 111–140.

20. Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R. (eds.) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. — New York: Longman, 2001.

21. Selwyn N. Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. — Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.

22. UNESCO. AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-makers. — Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2021.

23. Abdullayeva X.D. Development of contextual tasks in teaching chemistry to students of a medical university // International Conference on Advance Research in Humanities, Sciences and Education. — Rome, 2025. — January 30.

24. Abdullayeva X.D. The importance of modern lesson types in teaching chemistry at medical higher education institutions // International Scientific Journal Science Shine. — 2025. — No. 4. — P. 276–282.