STRESSGA BARDOSHLILIK INDEKSLARI ASOSIDA SHO'RLANISHGA CHIDAMLI NO'XAT (CICER ARIETINUM L.) GENOTIPLARINI IDENTIFIKATSIYA QILISH
PDF

Keywords

No'xat (Cicer arietinum L.)
genetik o'zgaruvchanlik
sho'rlanish
stressga chidamlilik indekslari

How to Cite

STRESSGA BARDOSHLILIK INDEKSLARI ASOSIDA SHO’RLANISHGA CHIDAMLI NO’XAT (CICER ARIETINUM L.) GENOTIPLARINI IDENTIFIKATSIYA QILISH. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(9), 1279-1285. https://doi.org/10.70728/a.series.tab.v08.i09.167

Abstract

Ushbu tadqiqotda no‘xat ( Cicerarietinum L. ) genotiplarining sho'rlanish darajalariga nisbatan bardoshliligi va genetik o'zgaruvchanligi 7 xil stress index (TOL, MPI, GMP, HM, STI, YI va YSI) yordamida baholandi. Natijalar organilgan kolleksiyada sho'rlanishga reaktsiyasi bo'yicha genetik bog’liqligini ko'rsatadi. Mahalliy navlardan Malxotra Guliston , Lazzat , Iftixor hamda jahon kolleksiyasidan SSA-2, 10, 11, 12, 16, 19, 27, 34, 35 va 36 namunalarida yuqori stressga baardoshlilikni namoyon qildi. Ushbu no'xatning genotiplari turli iqlim sharoitida yuqori don hosildorligiga ega va bu genotiplar boshqa genotiplarga nisbatan yuqori rentabellikga ega bo‘lgan hosildor va stressga bardoshli genotiplarni aniqlashdan iborat.
PDF

References

1. Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. //Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018. –P. 35, 1547–1549

2. Basavaraj P. S., Rane J., Jangid K. K., Babar R., Kumar M., Gangurde A., ... & Prabhakar M. Index-Based selection of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes for enhanced drought tolerance. //Scientific Reports, 2025. –P. 15(1), 8282, 1-12.

3. Fernandez G.C.J., Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. //Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. 1992. –P. 257–270.

4. Choudhury, M. Generative AI has a language problem. //Nature human behaviour, 2023. –P. 7(11), 1802-1803.

5. Abdeldym E. A., El-Mogy, M. M., Abdellateaf H. R., & Atia M. A. Genetic characterization, agro-morphological and physiological evaluation of grafted tomato under salinity stress conditions. //Agronomy, 2020. –P. 10(12), 1948, 1-26.

6. Eynizadeh P., Ravari S. Z., Moradi M., Dehghani A., & Dehghani H. Determining tolerant tomato genotypes to salt stress according to physiological and morphological manner. //AoB Plants, 2023. –P. 15(6), plad037, 1-11.

7. Sharma S., Tiwar S., Paliwal, V., Mathur D. K., & Bhargava P. Study of patterns of sexually transmitted diseases using a syndromic approach in the era of human immunodeficiency virus from a tertiary care hospital of the Northern India. //Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS, 2015. –P. 36(2), 158-161.

8. Singh S., & Singh S. K., Psychological health and well-being in patients with sexually transmitted infections: A prospective cross-sectional study. //Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS, 2021. –P. 42(2), 125-131.

9. Rosielle A. A., Hamblin J. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non‐stress environment 1 //Crop science. – 1981. – Т. 21. – №. 6. – P. 943-946.

10. Bidinger F.R., Mahalakshmi V., Rao G.D.P.,. Assessment of drought resistance in pэарл millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). II.* Estimation of genotype response to stress.// Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1987. –P. 38(1), 49-59.

11. Bouslama M., Schapaugh W.T., Stress Tolerance in Soybeans. I. Evaluation of Three Screening Techniques for Heat and Drought Tolerance // Crop science 1984. –P. 24.5, 933-937.

12. Pour-Aboughadareh A., Mehrvar M. R., Sanjani S., Amini A., Nikkhah-Chamanabad H., & Asadi A. Effects of salinity stress on seedling biomass, physiochemical properties, and grain yield in different breeding wheat genotypes. //Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2021. –P. 43(7), 98, 1-14.