Keywords
yozuv kompetensiyasi
jarayonga asoslangan yozuv
janrga asoslangan pedagogika
process-genre yondashuvi
qayta aloqa
elektron portfolio
korpus texnologiyasi
sun’iy intellekt
refleksiya
How to Cite
Abstract
Mazkur maqolada bo‘lajak ingliz tili o‘qituvchilariga yozuvni o‘rgatishda qo‘llanadigan zamonaviy pedagogik texnologiyalar integrativ nazariy-metodik nuqtayi nazardan tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqotimizning maqsadi yozuv kompetensiyasini rivojlantiruvchi texnologiyalarning didaktik vazifalarini aniqlash, ularni yozish jarayonining bosqichlari va bo‘lajak o‘qituvchining kasbiy ehtiyojlari bilan bog‘lash hamda yaxlit metodik modelni asoslashdan iborat. Material sifatida 2006-2025-yillarda chop etilgan 26 ta ilmiy va me’yoriy manba tanlandi. Integrativ adabiyotlar sharhi, qiyosiy tahlil, tematik kodlash va metodik modellashtirish usullaridan foydalanildi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, jarayonga va janrga asoslangan yozuv, elektron profloio, tengdoshlar qayta aloqasi, blended ta’lim, korpus texnologiyalari, va sun’iy intelektga asoslangan qayta aloqa alohida alohida qo’llanganda yozuv layoqatini ayrim jihatlarini rivojlantiradi. Lekin larni loyihalash, dalillash, qayta aloqa va o‘z-o‘zini tahlil qilish va baholash bo‘limlari bilan birgalikda qo‘llash esa lingvistik, diskursiv, janriy, strategik, refleksiv va raqamli kompetensiyalarni birgalikda shakllantirish imkonini beradi. Maqolamizda “yozuvchi talaba - yozuvni o‘rgatuvchi bo‘lajak mutaxassis” tamoyiliga asoslangan integrativ model hamda uni amalga oshirish uchun besh metodik shart taklif etiladi. Xulosa sifatida texnologiyaning samarasi uning yangiligiga emas, aniq pedagogik maqsad, o‘qituvchi mediatsiyasi, mezonli qayta aloqa va akademik halollik bilan bog‘lanishiga bog‘liq ekani asoslandi.References
1. Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020.
2. IELTS. IELTS Writing Key Assessment Criteria. IELTS.org,
2023. URL: https://ielts.org/cdn/Guides/ielts-writing-key-assessment-criteria.pdf
3. Cambridge English. Assessing Writing for Cambridge English Qualifications: A Guide for Teachers. B2 First for Schools. Cambridge Assessment English, 2020.
4. Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu / ed. by Y. Punie. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union,
2017. DOI: 10.2760/159770.
5. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge // Teachers College Record. 2006. -Vol. 108. -No. 6. -pp. 1017–1054.
6. Kimmons R., Graham C.R., West R.E. The PICRAT Model for Technology Integration in Teacher Preparation // Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 2020. -Vol. 20. -No. 1. -pp. 176–198.
7. Jalolov J.J. Chet til o‘qitish metodikasi. Toshkent: O‘qituvchi NMIU, 2012. - 150 b.
8. Пассов Е.И., Кузовлева Н.Е. Основы коммуникативной теории и технологии иноязычного образования. Москва: Русский язык. Курсы, 2010. - 568 с.
9. Hyland K. Genre-Based Instruction and Corpora // TESOL Quarterly. 2024. -Vol. 58. -No. 3. -pp. 1227–1234. DOI: 10.1002/tesq.3273.
10. Emilia E., Hamied F.A. Systemic Functional Linguistic Genre Pedagogy (SFL GP) in a Tertiary EFL Writing Context in Indonesia // TEFLIN Journal. 2015. -Vol. 26. -No. 2. -pp. 155–182.
11. Wang X., Ganapathy M. A Systematic Literature Review of Process Genre Approach in EFL Writing Teaching in China: From Theory to Practice // Language Teaching Research Quarterly. 2025. -Vol. 49. -pp. 20–40. DOI: 10.32038/ltrq.2025.49.02.
12. Kitajroonchai N., Kitjaroonchai T., Sanitchai P. The Effects of Process Genre-Based Writing and Process Writing Approaches on Asian EFL Pre-University Students’ Writing Performance // Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2022. -Vol. 13. -No. 4. -pp. 860–871. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1304.19.
13. Cao S., Zhou S., Luo Y., Wang T., Zhou T., Xu Y. A Review of the ESL/EFL Learners’ Gains from Online Peer Feedback on English Writing // Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. -Vol.
13. Article
1035803. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803.
14. Cheng Y.-H. E-Portfolios in EFL Writing: Benefits and Challenges // Language Education & Assessment. 2022. -Vol. 5. -No. 1. -pp. 52–70. DOI: 10.29140/lea.v5n.815.
15. Gebrekidan H., Zeru A. Effects of Portfolio-Based Assessment on EFL Students’ Conceptions and Approaches to Writing // Cogent Education. 2023. -Vol. 10. -No.
1. Article
2195749. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2195749.
16. Graham C.R. Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions // Bonk C.J., Graham C.R. (eds.). Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006.
17. Azizov S.U. Bo‘lajak ingliz tili mutaxassislarining yozuv kompetensiyasini takomillashtirishda blended ta’lim texnologiyalari: PhD dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. Toshkent, 2025.
18. Radjabova G.G. Korpus texnologiyalari (COCA) talabalarning yozuv kompetensiyasini takomillashtirishda autentik materiallar manbayi sifatida: PhD dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. Toshkent, 2024.
19. Kobayashi Y., Abe M. A Corpus-Based Approach to the Register Awareness of Asian Learners of English // Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. 2016. -Vol. 20. -No. 2. -pp. 1–17.
20. Shi H., Aryadoust V. A Systematic Review of AI-Based Automated Written Feedback Research // ReCALL. 2024. -Vol. 36. -No. 2. -pp. 187–209. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344023000265.
21. Liu W. A Systematic Review of Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback: Validity, Effects and Students’ Engagement // Language Teaching Research Quarterly. 2024. -Vol. 45. -pp. 86–105. DOI: 10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.05.
22. Teng M.F. A Systematic Review of ChatGPT for English as a Foreign Language Writing: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations // International Journal of TESOL Studies. 2024. -Vol. 6. -No. 3. -pp. 36–57.
23. Polakova P., Ivenz P. The Impact of ChatGPT Feedback on the Development of EFL Students’ Writing Skills // Cogent Education. 2024. -Vol. 11. -No.
1. Article
2410101. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101.
24. UNESCO. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO, 2023.
25. UNESCO. AI Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO, 2024.
26. British Council. Approaches to Process Writing. TeachingEnglish. URL: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/professional-development/teachers/knowing-subject/approaches-process-writing (murojaat sanasi: 24.07.2026).