BOLALAR TASAVVURINI O‘QITISH JARAYONI – PEDAGOGIK MUAMMO SIFATIDA
PDF

Keywords

tasavvur
intellekt xarita
ikkinchi til
ijodiy tafakkur
pedagogik muammo
“Ilm yo‘li” variativ dasturi
ta’lim metodlari.

How to Cite

BOLALAR TASAVVURINI O‘QITISH JARAYONI – PEDAGOGIK MUAMMO SIFATIDA. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(07.), 752-758. https://doi.org/10.70728/c.series.ped.v08.i07.103

Abstract

Ushbu maqolada bolalar tasavvurini rivojlantirish pedagogik muammo sifatida tahlil qilingan bo‘lib, ayniqsa ikkinchi tilni o‘qitish jarayonida intellekt xaritalaridan foydalanishning samaradorligi yoritilgan. Tadqiqot davomida nazariy tahlil, empirik kuzatish, eksperiment va suhbat metodlaridan foydalanildi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatdiki, intellekt xaritalari bolalarda nafaqat ikkinchi tilni tezroq o‘zlashtirish, balki yangi tushunchalarni mazmuniy bog‘lash, ijodiy tafakkur va tasavvurni faollashtirish imkonini beradi. Shuningdek, “Ilm yo‘li” variativ dasturi doirasida intellekt xaritalaridan foydalanish o‘quvchilarni bilim olish jarayoniga faol jalb qilish va ularning ijodiy salohiyatini rivojlantirishda muhim omil sifatida o‘zini oqladi. Tadqiqot natijalari tasavvur rivojlanishini ta’lim jarayonida samarali tashkil etish uchun zamonaviy pedagogik metodlarni integratsiya qilish zarurligini ko‘rsatadi.
PDF

References

1. Bialystok, E. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12116

2. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). Focus on multilingualism: A study of trilingual writing. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01206.x

3. D’Antoni, A. V., Zipp, G. P., & Olson, V. G. (2009). Interrater reliability of the mind map assessment rubric in a cohort of medical students. BMC Medical Education, 9, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-19

4. Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

5. Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500125

6. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929

7. Sawyer, R. K., & Reeves, J. (2019). The creativity of ecological systems: Lessons from classroom group work. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1635024

8. G‘aniyev, A. G., & Toshev, S. N. (2021). The role of imagination in the process of creative thinking: Developing students’ imagination and creative thinking skills in teaching physics. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 3569–3575.

9. Jabborov, R. R. (2019). Pedagogik jarayonda kreativ tafakkurni rivojlantirishning metodologik asoslari. O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti ilmiy xabarlari, 2(3), 112–118.

10. Ergasheva, M. M. (2022). Boshlang‘ich ta’lim jarayonida intellektual xaritalardan foydalanish metodikasi. Ta’lim va innovatsion tadqiqotlar jurnali, 1(7), 78–85.