Keywords
CEFR
pragmatika
pragmalingvistik xatolar
kommunikativ kompetensiya.
How to Cite
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada tilshunoslikda so‘nggi yillarda ko‘plab muhokamalarga sabab bo‘layotgan, ilmiy tadqiqotchilarning diqqat markazida turgan pragmalingvistik kompetensiya haqida fikr yuritiladi va shu doirada mavjud bo‘lgan muammolar, kamchiliklar va tushunmovchiliklar ko‘rsatilib, ularni kelib chiqish sabablari keltiriladi. Shuningdek, maqolada ko‘plab B2 darajadagi talabalarda pragmalingvistik kompetensiya bo‘yicha takrorlanadigan xatolar ustida ishlashga hamda uni rivojlantirishga oid ijobiy natijalarga olib boruvchi yechimlar o‘z ifodasini topadi.References
1. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 677–713.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the Empirical Evidence: Grounds for Instruction in Pragmatics? In K. Rose, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in Language Teaching (pp. 13-32). Cambridge University Press.
3. Boxer, D., & Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal, 44–58.
4. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
5. Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. New York, NY: Routledge
6. Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
7. Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. University of Chicago Press.
8. Nurdiana, N. (2019). Understanding pragmatics and pragmatic competence in ELT materials. Journal of English Language and Culture, 10(1), 32–42.
9. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.
10. Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely ?, 12-13