Keywords
bo‘lajak ingliz tili o‘qituvchisi
tanqidiy- refleksiv yozuv kompetensiyasi
ikkinchi tilda yozish
sun’iy intellekt savodxonligi
metakognitiv refleksiya
jarayonli baholash
akademik halollik.
How to Cite
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada generativ sun’iy intellekt muhitida bo‘lajak ingliz tili o‘qituvchilarining tanqidiy-refleksiv yozuv kompetensiyasini rivojlantirishning nazariy va metodik asoslari yoritilgan. Tadqiqotning maqsadi sun’iy intellekt yaratgan matnni tayyor mahsulot sifatida qabul qilishga emas, balki uni tahlil qilish, dalillarini tekshirish, mualliflik pozitsiyasi asosida qayta ishlash va yozuv jarayoni yuzasidan refleksiya yuritishga yo‘naltirilgan metodik tizimni asoslashdan iborat. Nazariy tahlil, qiyoslash, pedagogik modellashtirish va konseptual sintez metodlari asosida mazkur kompetensiyaning lingvistik- diskursiv, tanqidiy-analitik, sun’iy intellekt bilan hamkorlik, refleksiv-metakognitiv hamda etik-mualliflik komponentlari belgilandi. “Mustaqil loyihalash - sun’iy intellekt bilan dialog - verifikatsiya - qayta matnlashtirish - refleksiya - transfer” bosqichlaridan iborat didaktik sikl taklif qilindi. Yozuv mahsulidan tashqari qoralamalar, so‘rovlar tarixi, tahrir izlari, manbalarni tekshirish dalillari va refleksiv izohni qamrab oluvchi jarayonli baholash mezonlari asoslandi. Taklif etilgan yondashuv bo‘lajak o‘qituvchining til kompetensiyasi, mustaqil tafakkuri, akademik halolligi va sun’iy intellekt savodxonligini o‘zaro uyg‘un rivojlantirishga xizmat qiladi.References
1. Flower L., Hayes J. R. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing // College Composition and Communication. – 1981. – Vol. 32, No. 4. – P. 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
2. Schön D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. – New York: Basic Books, 1983. – 374 p.
3. Zimmerman B. J. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview // Theory Into Practice. – 2002. – Vol. 41, No. 2. – P. 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4102_2
4. Carless D., Boud D. The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 43, No. 8. – P. 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
5. Long D., Magerko B. What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations // Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. – New York: ACM, 2020. – P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
6. Kohnke L., Moorhouse B. L., Zou D. ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning // RELC Journal. – 2023. – Vol. 54, No. 2. – P. 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
7. Barrot J. S. Using ChatGPT for Second Language Writing: Pitfalls and Potentials // Assessing Writing. – 2023. – Vol. 57. – Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
8. Kasneci E., Sessler K., Küchemann S. et al. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education // Learning and Individual Differences. – 2023. – Vol. 103. – Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
9. Miao F., Holmes W. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. – Paris: UNESCO, 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
10. Edmett A., Ichaporia N., Crompton H., Crichton R. Artificial Intelligence and English Language Teaching: Preparing for the Future. 2nd ed. – London: British Council, 2024. https://doi.org/10.57884/78EA-3C69
11. Moorhouse B. L., Kohnke L. The Effects of Generative AI on Initial Language Teacher Education: The Perceptions of Teacher Educators // System. – 2024. – Vol. 122. – Article 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290
12. Miao F., Cukurova M. AI Competency Framework for Teachers. – Paris: UNESCO, 2024. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
13. Wang C., Wang Z. Investigating L2 Writers’ Critical AI Literacy in AI-Assisted Writing: An APSE Model // Journal of Second Language Writing. – 2025. – Vol. 67. – Article 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187
14. Felice M., Spiby R., O’Sullivan B., Edmett A. Human-Centred AI: Lessons for English Learning and Assessment. – London: British Council, 2025. https://doi.org/10.57884/AH6Y-SD55
15. Hwang H., Chang X., Sun J. Generative AI Is Useful for Second Language Writing, but When, Why, and for How Long Do Learners Use It? // Journal of Second Language Writing. – 2025. – Vol. 69. – Article 101230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101230
16. Karaduman C. Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Perceived AI Literacy and Competency: The Integration of ChatGPT Into English Language Teacher Education // SAGE Open. – 2025. – Vol. 15, No. 3. – P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251379712
17. OECD. OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring Effective Uses of Generative AI in Education. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2026. – 247 p. https://doi.org/10.1787/062a7394-en