YUQORI SIRT MAYDONIGA EGA FUNKSIONALLASHGAN SiO₂ NANOKATALIZATORINI OLISH VA UNING FIZIK-KIMYOVIY XOSSALARINI TADQIQ ETISH
PDF

Keywords

Sulfon kislotasi katalizatori
Mezoporozli kremniy
Ko‘p komponentli reaksiya
Pirido[2
3-d:6
5-d′]dipirimidinlar
Geterogen kataliz.

How to Cite

YUQORI SIRT MAYDONIGA EGA FUNKSIONALLASHGAN SiO₂ NANOKATALIZATORINI OLISH VA UNING FIZIK-KIMYOVIY XOSSALARINI TADQIQ ETISH. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(07), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.70728/a.series.tab.v08.i07.050

Abstract

Ushbu ishda Nano-SiO₂@[DPSSP][Cl]₂ deb belgilangan yangi sulfon kislotasi-funksionalizatsiyalangan kremniy asosidagi gibrid nanokatalizator mezoporoz kremniy ramkasiga organik ion funksionalligini kovalent immobilizatsiya qilish orqali muvaffaqiyatli sintez qilindi. Tayyorlangan katalizatorning strukturaviy, morfologik, termal va sirt xususiyatlari FT-IR, FE-SEM, XRD, azot adsorbsiyasi-desorbsiyasi (BET/BJH) va termogravimetrik tahlil (TGA) yordamida har tomonlama o‘rganildi. FT-IR spektrlari kremniy yuzasiga sulfon kislotasi va organik funktsional guruhlarning muvaffaqiyatli qo‘shilishini tasdiqladi, EDX tahlili esa Si, O, C, N, S va Cl elementlarining mavjudligini tasdiqladi. Elektron mikroskopiyasi taxminan 9 dan 31 nm gacha bo‘lgan o‘lchamlarga ega bir tekis taqsimlangan nanopartikullarni aniqladi. XRD tahlili kristallit o‘lchamlari 20 dan 37 nm gacha bo‘lgan gibrid katalizatorning asosan amorf tabiatini ko‘rsatdi.
PDF

References

[1] S.A. Zhdanok, Porous media combustion based hydrogen production, in: European Combustion Meeting, 2003. http://www.icare.cnrs-orleans.fr/WJ/FESCI/ECM/l5- 2003-ecm.pdf.

[2] C. Huang, Y. Yu, X. Tang, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, C. Ye, Y. Ye, R. Zhang, Hydrogen generation by ammonia decomposition over Co/CeO2 catalyst: influence of support morphologies, Appl. Surf. Sci. 532 (2020), 147335, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147335.

[3] Baykara SZ. Hydrogen: a brief overview on its sources, production and environmental impact. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2018;43:10605e14.

[4] Dincer I, Acar C. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2015;40:11094e111.

[5] Asleshirin S, Bahmani M, Fazlali A, Fadavi O. The static and dynamic modeling of a steam methane reforming hydrogen plant. Petrol Sci Technol 2012;30:1882e92.

[6] Pantoleontos G, Kikkinides ES, Georgiadis MC. A heterogeneous dynamic model for the simulation and optimisation of the steam methane reforming reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012;37:16346e58.

[7] Nobandegani MS, Birjandi MRS, Darbandi T, Khalilipour MM, Shahraki F, Mohebbi-Kalhori D. An industrial Steam Methane Reformer optimization using response surface methodology. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 2016;36:540e9