Keywords
Pragmatic Functions
Scientific Discourse
Authorial
How to Cite
Abstract
This research examines the pragmatic utility of affective and evaluative vocabulary within English-language scientific writing. Contrary to the traditional view of science as a purely neutral medium, this study utilizes corpus-based techniques to reveal how evaluative language functions as a strategic instrument for rhetorical persuasion and authorial positioning. The analysis indicates that lexical selections are systematically employed to justify research inquiries, substantiate methodological rigor, and manage the writer's relationship with the academic community. Ultimately, the deployment of "attitudinal markers" does not compromise objectivity; rather, it serves as a critical pragmatic tool for establishing authority and underscoring the relevance of findings in prestigious academic outlets.References
1. Giannoni, D. S. Mapping Academic Values in the Disciplines: A Corpus-Based Study of Evaluative Lexis. – Bern: Peter Lang, 2010. – 332 pp.
2. Hyland, K. Stance and Engagement: Academic Argument in Interdisciplinary Perspective // Applied Linguistics. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. – Vol. 26, No. 2. – pp. 173-192.
3. Iriskulov, M. T. Tilshunoslikka kirish (Introduction to Linguistics). – Tashkent: Yangi asr avlodi, 2009. – 256 pp.
4. Lutfullayeva, D. Lingvistika va milliy g'oya (Linguistics and National Idea). – Tashkent: Muharrir nashriyoti, 2010. – 180 pp.
5. Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. – New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. – 278 pp.
6. Safarov, Sh. Pragmalingvistika (Pragmalinguistics). – Tashkent: O‘zbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi, 2008. – 286 pp.
7. Swales, J. M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. – 260 pp.
8. Yuldashev, B. O‘zbek tili sotsiolingvistikasi (Sociolinguistics of the Uzbek Language). – Tashkent: Fan, 2004. – 212 pp.