Abstract
This study explores the formation of speech acts on social media in English and Uzbek, drawing on Speech Act Theory and linguistic research. It highlights differences in pragmatic strategies, politeness, and syntactic structures shaped by cultural values. The article also discusses challenges posed by informal language use and problematic speech acts like hate speech in digital communication. Findings underscore the importance of culturally informed approaches for effective cross-cultural interaction, especially in less-resourced languages such as Uzbek.References
1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
2. Austin, J. L. (1975). Speech acts: The philosophical papers (J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisà, Eds.). Clarendon Press.
3. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
4. Axmadjonova, M. (2024). A comparative analysis of speech act theory applied to the English and Uzbek languages, considering both semantic and structural levels. Qo‘qon Universiteti Xabarnomasi, 13, 281–283. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v13i.1076
5. Mohinur, M. (2024). Semantic structural analysis of speech acts in English and Uzbek languages. Ижтимоий-Гуманитар Фанларнинг Долзарб Муаммолари / Актуальные Проблемы Социально-Гуманитарных Наук / Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.47390/spr1342v4i6y2024n74
6. Jegede, O. O. (2024). Speech acts in the digital sphere: A corpus-based exploration of interactional dynamics on social media platforms. Corpus-Based Studies across Humanities, 2(2), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1515/csh-2024-0023
7. Abdullaeva, A. B., & Tukhtakhodjayeva, Z. T. (2025). Linguistic features of internet texting in Uzbek language. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(4), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-04-04
8. Rokhatoy Khudayberganovna, R. A. (2024). Politeness strategies and cultural specificity in English and Uzbek: A comparative analysis Nazarov, S. (2024). Structural and semantic differences in word combinations within English and Uzbek: Syntactic and pragmatic perspectives.
9. R. Abidova & R. Khudayberganovna. (2024). Linguocultural specificity of gratitude speech acts in English and Uzbek.
10. Benamara, F., Inkpen, D., & Taboada, M. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on language in social media: Exploiting discourse and other contextual information. Computational Linguistics, 44(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00333
11. Alsamhori, M. A. O., Seine, M. I., & Al-Zuriqat, Z. K. (2025). Speech acts as a means of influence and social interaction: Perspectives from Austin and Searle. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.771