COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN, AND UZBEK
PDF

Keywords

financial terminology
comparative linguistics
semantic analysis
terminology equivalence
multilingual terminology
English
Russian
Uzbek
financial discourse
terminology standardization
loanwords
corpus linguistics
glossary compilation.

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL TERMINOLOGY IN ENGLISH, RUSSIAN, AND UZBEK. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(7), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.70728/b.series.fil.v08.i07.017

Abstract

The rapid globalization of financial markets, international trade, and digital banking has significantly increased the demand for unified and standardized financial terminology across different languages. As English has become the dominant language of international finance, numerous financial concepts have entered other languages through direct borrowing, semantic adaptation, and terminological translation. Consequently, ensuring semantic equivalence among financial terms has become an essential task for linguists, translators, economists, and policymakers. This study presents a comparative analysis of financial terminology in English, Russian, and Uzbek by examining lexical, semantic, structural, and functional characteristics of financial terms. The research focuses on the classification of financial terminology, terminology equivalence, non-equivalent vocabulary, borrowing processes, terminology standardization, and multilingual financial discourse. A corpus consisting of terminology extracted from international financial organizations, banking legislation, economic dictionaries, and academic publications was analyzed using comparative linguistic methods, semantic analysis, structural analysis, corpus-based investigation, and descriptive approaches. The findings reveal that English terminology demonstrates a high degree of conceptual precision and international acceptance, while Russian terminology reflects a mixture of native formations and international loanwords. Uzbek financial terminology is characterized by continuous development, including the coexistence of indigenous lexical resources and numerous borrowed international terms. The study identifies several categories of equivalent, partially equivalent, and non-equivalent financial terms and proposes recommendations for improving financial terminology standardization in multilingual communication. The research contributes to comparative terminology studies and provides a practical foundation for translators, lexicographers, researchers, educators, and specialists engaged in multilingual financial communication.
PDF

References

1. Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge.

2. Bowker, L., & Pearson, J. (2002). Working with specialized language: A practical guide to using corpora. Routledge.

3. Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

4. Deschrijver, C. (2020). Metalinguistic density as an indicator of sharedness: Economic and financial terms in online interaction. Language & Communication, 71, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.01.001

5. El-Haj, M., Rayson, P., Walker, M., Young, S., & Simaki, V. (2019). In search of meaning: Lessons, resources and next steps for computational analysis of financial discourse. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 46(3–4), 265–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12378

6. Felber, H. (1984). Terminology manual. UNESCO & Infoterm.

7. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 704:2019: Terminology work—Principles and methods. ISO.

8. Kalugina, J. E. (2020). Analysis of country-specific terminological units in economics from English sources. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 11(3), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2020-11-3-517-531

9. Lee, J., & Lee, Y. H. (2020). A study on the establishment of a corpus-based terminology list for the preparation of specialized interpretations: Focused on economic and financial domains in speech. The Journal of Translation Studies, 21(5), 269–297. https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2020.21.5.010

10. Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall