Abstract
Maqolada oliy ta’limda sifat menejmenti tizimini takomillashtirishning uslubiy-tashkiliy masalalari meta-analiz usulida tahlil qilingan bo‘lib, tadqiqotda PRISMA tamoyillari asosida tanlangan empirik tadqiqotlar va mavjud meta-analizlar miqdoriy sintez qilindi. Sintez natijalari sifat menejmenti tizimining oliy ta’lim sifatiga kuchli va statistik ishonchli ijobiy ta’sirini tasdiqladi (umumiy effekt rRE=0,856; z=7,90; p<0,001). Shu bilan birga, tadqiqotlar o‘rtasidagi yuqori geterogenlik sifat menejmenti samaradorligi uslubiy-tashkiliy omillarga kuchli bog‘liq ekanligini ko‘rsatdi. Tashkiliy omillar ichida boshqaruv qo‘llab-quvvatlashi va liderlik eng kuchli determinant (taxminan 34 foiz hissa), undan keyin professor-o‘qituvchilar jalb etilishi, infratuzilma sifati va talabalar jalb etilishi turadi. Maqolada sifat menejmenti tizimini takomillashtirishning ko‘p bosqichli uslubiy-tashkiliy sikli taklif etilgan.
References
1. Yusuf F. A. Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality of Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Study // International Journal of Instruction. 2023. Vol. 16, No. 2. P. 161–178. DOI: 10.29333/iji.2023.16210a. URL: https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/136 (murojaat sanasi: 06.06.2026).
2. Serrano O. M. E., Miranda González F. J., Mourato J. A. B. Determinants of the effectiveness of quality assurance systems and institutional performance in higher education // Cogent Education. 2025. Vol. 12, No. 1. Art. 2581411. DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2025.2581411.
3. Serrano O., Miranda Gonzalez F., Mourato J. Impact of Quality Assurance on Higher Education Institution Performance: Differences Between Public and Private Institutions // Societies. 2026. Vol. 16, No. 3. Art. 76. DOI: 10.3390/soc16030076. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/16/3/76 (murojaat sanasi: 06.06.2026).
4. Dhawan S. Higher Education Quality and Student Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis, Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression // Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research. 2022. Vol. 21, No. 1. P. 48–66. DOI: 10.1177/09726225221082376.
5. Asif M., Awan M. U., Khan M. K., Ahmad N. A model for total quality management in higher education // Quality & Quantity. 2013. Vol. 47, No. 4. P. 1883–1904. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9632-9.
6. Nadeem M. A. Leadership’s Role in Effective Quality Assurance Implementation in Higher Education Institutions // Education Quarterly Reviews. 2023. Vol. 6, No. 3. P. 237–249. DOI: 10.31014/aior.1993.06.03.778.
7. Guil Gorostidi S. C., Rubio-Arostegui J. A. Quality management in higher education from the perspective of institutional isomorphism: a scoping review // Frontiers in Education. 2026. Vol. 10. Art. 1720224. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1720224.
8. Širec K., Rožman M. Collaborative Leadership for Quality Assurance: A Case Study on Developing a Strategic Quality Manual in Higher Education // Education Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15, No. 12. Art. 1627. DOI: 10.3390/educsci15121627. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/12/1627 (murojaat sanasi: 06.06.2026).
9. Sarrico C. S. Quality management, performance measurement and indicators in higher education institutions: between burden, inspiration and innovation // Quality in Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 28, No. 1. P. 11–28. DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2021.1951445.
10. Nair A. Meta-analysis of the relationship between quality management practices and firm performance: implications for quality management theory development // Journal of Operations Management. 2006. Vol. 24, No. 6. P. 948–975. DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005.
11. ISO 21001:2018. Educational organizations — Management systems for educational organizations — Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2018. 63 p.
12. Page M. J., McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T. C., Mulrow C. D. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews // BMJ. 2021. Vol. 372. Art. n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
13. Hunter J. E., Schmidt F. L. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2015. 656 p.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.