THE IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL CLIMATE ON STUDENT SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT IN THE EFL CLASSROOM IN HIGHER EDUCATION
PDF

Keywords

emotional climate
speaking engagement
EFL classroom
higher education
psychological safety
foreign language anxiety
student participation
communicative competence.

How to Cite

THE IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL CLIMATE ON STUDENT SPEAKING ENGAGEMENT IN THE EFL CLASSROOM IN HIGHER EDUCATION. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(3), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.70728/c.series.v08.i03.071

Abstract

This study explores how the emotional climate of the classroom influences student speaking engagement in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) course at the university level. Although communicative teaching methods are widely used, many students remain reluctant to participate actively in speaking tasks, even when they have sufficient language proficiency. The research suggests that this reluctance may be connected not only to linguistic factors but also to the emotional atmosphere in the classroom. A short-term pilot experiment was conducted with 48 undergraduate students divided into control and experimental groups. The experimental group experienced targeted strategies aimed at creating a supportive and psychologically safe environment, including delayed error correction, positive feedback, humor-based warm-ups, and cooperative peer interaction. The results showed a significant increase in voluntary participation and longer student responses in the experimental group. The findings demonstrate that emotional climate is a manageable pedagogical factor that can directly enhance students’ willingness to speak and engage more actively in EFL classrooms.
PDF

References

1. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

2. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

3. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–

4. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

5. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-

6. tb05256.x

7. MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-

8. tb05543.x

9. Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563

10. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–

11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68