NOMINALIZATION STRATEGIES IN ANALYTIC VS. AGGLUTINATIVE LANGUAGES
PDF

Keywords

Nominalization, analytic languages, agglutinative languages, morphology, syntax, English, Uzbek, Turkish, linguistic typology, discourse

How to Cite

NOMINALIZATION STRATEGIES IN ANALYTIC VS. AGGLUTINATIVE LANGUAGES. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(3), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.70728/

Abstract

Nominalization in analytic and agglutinative languages reveals distinct morphological and syntactic patterns that shape discourse organization. By examining derivational processes and argument structures, this analysis highlights cross-linguistic contrasts and their impact on information density, cognitive processing, and linguistic expression.

PDF

References

1. Alexiadou, A., Doron, E., & Giannakidou, A. (2010). The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Oxford University Press.

2. Bickel, B., & Nichols, J. (2007). Inflectional Morphology. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.

3. Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (2010). Nominalization in Grammar and Discourse. Oxford University Press.

4. Kholikov, F. (2018). O‘zbek tilining morfologik tuzilishi [Morphological Structure of Uzbek Language]. Tashkent: Fan.

5. Murat, B. (2015). Turkish Nominalization Processes. Turkish Studies, 10(4), 123–145.

6. Sultonova, N. (2012). O‘zbek tilida nominasiyalash fenomeni [Nominalization Phenomenon in Uzbek]. Oriental Studies Journal, 5(1), 45–60.

7. Venkata, S. (2012). Syntax of Nominalization: An Overview. Language Sciences, 34(3), 216–229.

8. Lai, P. (2009). Nominalization and Language Typology. Journal of Linguistic Typology, 13(2), 89–127

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.