Keywords
sun'iy intellekt
nazariy-metodologik asoslar
pedagogik integratsiya
konstruktivizm
konnektivizm
raqamli ta'lim
shaxsiylashtirilgan o'qitish.
How to Cite
Abstract
Sun'iy intellekt (SI) texnologiyalarining ta'lim sohasiga jadal kirib kelishi adaptiv o'qitish konsepsiyasining nazariy-metodologik asoslarini qayta ko'rib chiqish zaruriyatini keltirib chiqarmoqda. Hozirgi paytda texnologik imkoniyatlar va pedagogik nazariya o'rtasida tizimli uzilish kuzatilmoqda. Tadqiqotning maqsadi adaptiv o'qitishning nazariy-metodologik asoslarini sistemali tahlil qilish va sun'iy intellekt bilan integratsiyasining didaktik modelini ishlab chiqishdan iborat. Tadqiqot adaptiv o'qitishning yangilangan, nazariy jihatdan asoslangan metodologik tuzilmasi va SI bilan integratsiyaning bosqichma-bosqich modelini taklif qiladi. Bu o'quv dasturlarini loyihalash, o'qituvchilarni tayyorlash va ta'lim siyosatini ishlab chiqishda amaliy ahamiyatga ega.References
1. Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
2. Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Bali, M., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C. M., Romero-Hall, E., Koutropoulos, A., … Jandrić, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53-130.
3. Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
4. Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education: Contributors, collaborations, research topics, challenges, and future directions. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28-47.
5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
6. Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533.
7. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
8. Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M. D., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424.
9. Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824-2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
10. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Olimjon Odiljon o'g'li Alixanov (Author)