Keywords
analitik fikrlash
TPACK modeli
Learning Analytics
adaptiv o‘qitish
individual monitoring
interaktiv modifikatsiya
didaktik imkoniyatlar.
How to Cite
Abstract
Ushbu maqolada raqamli ta’lim muhitida talabalar analitik fikrlashini rivojlantirishning didaktik imkoniyatlari ilmiy jihatdan tahlil qilingan. Raqamli ta’lim resurslarining mazmuniy, tashkiliy va texnik komponentlari asosida analitik fikrlashni shakllantirish mexanizmlari ko‘rib chiqilgan. TPACK modeli, Learning Analytics va adaptiv o‘qitish texnologiyalari analitik fikrlashni rivojlantirishning nazariy-metodologik asosi sifatida asoslab berilgan. Individual monitoring va interaktiv modifikatsiyalar talabalarning kognitiv faoliyatini faollashtiruvchi muhim didaktik vositalar sifatida qaralgan. Tadqiqot natijalari raqamli ta’lim muhitida analitik fikrlashni rivojlantirishga qaratilgan pedagogik yondashuvlarning samaradorligini oshirish imkonini beruvchi amaliy tavsiyalar bilan yakunlangan.References
1. The Future of Jobs Report
2023. World Economic Forum. – Cologny/Geneva, 2023. – 296 p. – ISBN 978-2-940631-96-4.
2. Sternberg R.J., Halpern D.F. (Eds.). Critical Thinking in Psychology. 2nd ed. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. – 402 p.
3. Krathwohl D.R. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview // Theory Into Practice. – 2002. – Vol. 41(4). – P. 212-218.
4. Conole G., Dyke M. What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? // Research in Learning Technology. – 2004. – Vol. 12(2). – P. 113-124.
5. Mishra P., Koehler M.J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge // Teachers College Record. – 2006. – Vol. 108(6). – P. 1017-1054.
6. Long P., Siemens G. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education // EDUCAUSE Review. – 2011. – Vol. 46(5). – P. 31–40.
7. Ergashev M.E. Talabalarda differensial tenglamalarga oid analitik fikrlashni rivojlantirish // New Renaissance: International Scientific Journal. – 2025. – 3(2). – B. 783-787.
8. Qaxxorova Sh. Analitik fikrlashni rivojlantirishda Al-Xorazmiy algoritmlari va ularning pedagogik ahamiyati // ICEDH Xalqaro konferensiya. – Moskva, 2025. – B. 27-32.
9. UNESCO. Recommendation on Open Educational Resources (OER). UNESCO General Conference, 40th Session. – Paris, 2019.
10. Mayer R.E. Multimedia Learning. 3rd ed. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. – 524 p.
11. Freeman S. et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics // PNAS. – 2014. – Vol. 111(23). – P. 8410–8415.
12. Siemens G. Learning Analytics // American Behavioral Scientist. – 2013. – Vol. 57(10). – P. 1380–1400.
13. Bergmann J., Sams A. Flip Your Classroom. – Washington: ISTE, 2012. – 112 p. – ISBN 978-1-56484-315-9.
14. Cobos R., Wilde A., Zarraonandia T. Self-Regulated Learning and Active Feedback of MOOC Learners // Electronics. – 2023. – Vol. 12(15). – Art. 3368.
15. Kabudi T., Pappas I.O., Olsen D.H. AI-enabled adaptive learning systems: a systematic mapping // Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. – 2021. – Vol. 2. – Art. 100017.
16. Du Plooy E., Casteleijn D., Franzsen D. Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review // Heliyon. – 2024. – Vol. 10(21). – Art. e39630.
17. Vandewaetere M., Desmet P., Clarebout G. The contribution of learner characteristics in adaptive learning environments // Computers in Human Behavior. – 2011. – Vol. 27(1). – P. 118–130.
18. Andreucci-Annunziata P. et al. Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education // Front. Educ. – 2023. – 8:1141686.
19. Cain J.S. Developing the Analytical Skills of Students: Experiences of Generalist Teachers // IJPREMS. – 2024. – Vol. 4(6). – P. 1890–1898.
20. Jamolova G., Meliyev M., Muhammadiyeva E. Talabalarda analitik tafakkurni rivojlantirishning pedagogik asoslari // Maktabgacha va maktab ta’limi. – 2025. – №11. – B. 1605–1608.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 G'ulom Berdiyor o'g'li Urolov (Author)