IMPLICIT MEANING TRANSFER IN ARTISTIC DISCOURSE
PDF

Keywords

Implicit meaning transfer
artistic discourse
implicature
subtext
metaphor
symbolism
intertextuality
cognitive linguistics
pragmatics
discourse analysis
semiotics
interpretation.

How to Cite

IMPLICIT MEANING TRANSFER IN ARTISTIC DISCOURSE. (2026). Qo‘qon DPI. Ilmiy Xabarlar Jurnali, 8(05), 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.70728/b.series.fil.v08.i05.145

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of implicit meaning transfer in artistic discourse, focusing on the linguistic, pragmatic, cognitive, and cultural mechanisms that enable authors to convey meanings beyond literal expression. The research analyzes how artistic texts employ devices such as metaphor, symbolism, irony, subtext, and intertextuality to construct multilayered interpretations. Drawing upon theories from pragmatics (implicature and relevance theory), semiotics, cognitive linguistics (conceptual metaphor and blending), and discourse analysis, the paper explores the interpretative role of the reader in decoding hidden meanings. The findings demonstrate that implicit meaning transfer is a defining characteristic of artistic discourse, contributing to its aesthetic depth, emotional impact, and interpretative openness. The study highlights the interdisciplinary nature of meaning construction and emphasizes the importance of inferential processes in understanding literary and artistic texts.
PDF

References

1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

3. Barthes, R. (1977). Image–Music–Text. London: Fontana Press.

4. Eco, U. (1979). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

5. Eco, U. (1989). The Open Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

6. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

7. Galperin, I. R. (1977). Stylistics. Moscow: Higher School Publishing House.

8. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3. Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

9. Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

10. Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in Language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

11. Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva Reader (pp. 34–61). New York: Columbia University Press.

12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

13. Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

14. Saussure, F. de (1983). Course in General Linguistics (C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, Eds.; R. Harris, Trans.). London: Duckworth. (Original work published 1916).

15. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Dildora Eshpo'lat qizi Eshquvvatova (Author)