Abstract
Mazkur maqolada ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida shevaga xos leksik birliklarning struktur-semantik va sotsiolingvistik xususiyatlari qiyosiy asosda tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda sheva leksikasi faqat hududiy til hodisasi sifatida emas, balki ijtimoiy identitetni ifodalovchi va kommunikativ munosabatlarni tartibga soluvchi faol lingvistik vosita sifatida talqin etiladi. Empirik materiallar ingliz tili uchun zamonaviy korpus manbalari, o‘zbek tili uchun esa dialektologik tadqiqotlar va real og‘zaki nutq namunalariga tayangan holda shakllantirildi. Natijalar ingliz tilida shevaga xos birliklar ko‘proq ijtimoiy guruhlar, yosh va submadaniyatlar bilan bog‘liq holda qo‘llanishini, o‘zbek tilida esa ular asosan hududiy va madaniy identitetni ifodalashga xizmat qilishini ko‘rsatdi. Tadqiqot natijalari qiyosiy sotsiolingvistika, tarjimashunoslik va madaniyatlararo kommunikatsiya uchun nazariy hamda amaliy ahamiyatga ega.
References
1. Hasanova D. O ‘ZBEK TILIDA KASB-KOR IFODALOVCHI LEKSIK BIRLIKLARNING LEKSIKOGRAFIK TALQINI //Uzbekistan language and culture. – 2023. – Т. 5. – №. 1. – С. 122-127.
2. USAROVA D. TARJIMANING FRAZEOLOGIK MUAMMOLARI //LTEACHIN ANGUAGE. – С. 129.
3. Alimova Z., Soxibova U. FRAZEOLOGIK BIRLIKLAR VA ULARNING SEMANTIK TAHLILI //Farg'ona davlat universiteti. – 2023. – №. 1. – С. 167-167.
4. Rao P. S. The role of English as a global language //Research journal of English. – 2019. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 65-79.
5. Nigmatova L. K. Language and cultural issues in Uzbek vocabulary //Scientific Reports of Bukhara State University. – 2021. – Т. 5. – №. 1. – С. 30-49.
6. Mamatov A. E. Zamonaviy lingvistika //Toshkent: Noshir. – 2019. – Т. 135.
7. Leech G. The state of the art in corpus linguistics //English corpus linguistics. – 2014. – С. 8-29.
8. Bekmurodovna Y. D. et al. DIALECTOLOGY: DIALECTS OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS //Web of Teachers: Inderscience Research. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 361-365.
9. Nosirova M. THE ROLE OF ANTHROPOCENTRIC LINGUISTIC THEORIES IN UNDERSTANDING ONOMASTIC METAPHORS IN UZBEK LINGUISTICS //FILOLOGIYA MASALALARI (MAGISTRATURA). – 2025. – Т. 1. – №. M2. – С. 96-105.
10. Tullough J. B. G. Is a National Army Necessary for the British Isles, and if so, How Should One be Formed and Trained? //Royal United Services Institution. Journal. – 1907. – Т. 51. – №. 348. – С. 184-198.
11. Davies M. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English //Literary and linguistic computing. – 2010. – Т. 25. – №. 4. – С. 447-464.
12. Mair C. World Englishes and corpora //The Oxford handbook of world Englishes. – 2017. – С. 103-122.
13. Samixon A. O ‘zbek dialektologiyasi //T.: Navro ‘z nashriyoti. – 2016.
14. Qutlimuratova A. MEHNAT/LABOUR KONTSEPTINING QIYOSIY TADQIQOT METODLARI (QORAQALPOQ VA INGLIZ TILLARI MISOLIDA) //TANQIDIY NAZAR, TAHLILIY TAFAKKUR VA INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR. – 2025. – Т. 2. – №. 6. – С. 395-397.
15. Sodiq o‘g‘li X. S. INGLIZ VA O ‘ZBEK TILLARIDA TAOMLARGA OID SO ‘ZLARNING LINGVOKULTUROLOGIK VA STRUKTUR-SEMANTIK TADQIQI //SCHOLAR. – 2026. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 178-182.
16. Botiraliyevna X. M. SOTSIOLINGVISTIK METODLAR //TANQIDIY NAZAR, TAHLILIY TAFAKKUR VA INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR. – 2025. – Т. 2. – №. 6. – С. 814-817.
17. Bo’riyevna N. D. YO ‘NALMA HARAKAT FE’LLARINING KONTEKSTUAL TARJIMASI: EKVIVALENTLIK VA TRANSFORMATSIYA MUAMMOLARI //Latin American journal of education. – 2025. – Т. 5. – №. 6. – С. 34-39
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.