Keywords
qurg’oqchilik
CRISPR/Cas9.
How to Cite
Abstract
So’ya (Glycine max L) o’simligi qishloq xo’jaligi va oziq-ovqat sanoatida muhim o’simliklardan biri bo’lib, uning doni inson salomatligi uchun zarur bo’lgan oqsil va yog’ moddalarining asosiy manbalaridan biridir. Iqlim o’zgarishlari, qurg’oqchilik ko’plab o’simliklar qatorida so’yaning ham rivojlanishi va hosildorligiga salbiy ta’sir ko’rsatmoqda. Zamonaviy genom tahrirlash usullari yordamida qurg’oqchilik sharoitida ham normal rivojlanib, hosildorligini saqlagan so’ya navlarini yaratish imkoni mavjud. Ayniqsa, genom tahrirlashning CRISPR/Cas9 usuli o’zining osonligi, qulayligi va kam mablag’ talab qilganligi sababli hozirda turli tadqiqotlarda keng qo’llanilmoqda. Ushbu maqolada CRISPR/Cas9 texnologiyasi yordamida so’ya o’simligining qurg’oqchilikka chidamliligini oshirish borasida olib borilgan tadqiqotlarni tahlil qilish orqali muammolar va kelajakdagi istiqbollarni yoritib beriladi.References
1. Boerema A, Peeters A, Swolfs S, Vandevenne F, Jacobs S, Staes J, et al. Soybean Trade: Balancing Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts of an Intercontinental Market. Zia A, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0155222. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155222
2. Pagano MC, Miransari M. The importance of soybean production worldwide. Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Soybean Production. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 1–26. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801536-0.00001-3
3. FAOSTAT. [cited 7 May 2026]. Available: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize
4. Qin P, Wang T, Luo Y. A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development. J Agric Food Res. 2022;7: 100265. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100265
5. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Rahman A, Mahmud JA, Hossain MS, Fujita M. Soybean Production and Environmental Stresses. Environmental Stresses in Soybean Production. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 61–102. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-801535-3.00004-8
6. Bhardwaj SF. Consumptive Use and Water Requirement of Soybeans. J Irrig Drain Eng. 1986;112: 157–163. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1986)112:2(157)
7. Beguería S, Vicente-Serrano SM, Angulo-Martínez M. A Multiscalar Global Drought Dataset: The SPEIbase: A New Gridded Product for the Analysis of Drought Variability and Impacts. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2010;91: 1351–1356. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS2988.1
8. Miao Z, Han Z, Zhang T, Chen S, Ma C. A systems approach to a spatio-temporal understanding of the drought stress response in maize. Sci Rep. 2017;7: 6590. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06929-y
9. Damages and losses. In: www.fao.org [Internet]. [cited 7 May 2026]. doi:10.4060/cb3673en
10. Wei Y, Jin J, Jiang S, Ning S, Liu L. Quantitative Response of Soybean Development and Yield to Drought Stress during Different Growth Stages in the Huaibei Plain, China. Agronomy. 2018;8: 97. doi:10.3390/agronomy8070097
11. Ferreira RC, Sibaldelli RNR, Crusiol LGT, Neumaier N, Farias JRB. Soybean Yield Losses Related to Drought Events in Brazil: Spatial–Temporal Trends over Five Decades and Management Strategies. Agriculture. 2024;14: 2144. doi:10.3390/agriculture14122144
12. Carter TE, Todd SM, Gillen AM. Registration of ‘USDA‐N8002’ Soybean Cultivar with High Yield and Abiotic Stress Resistance Traits. J Plant Regist. 2016;10: 238–245. doi:10.3198/jpr2015.09.0057crc
13. Seo JS, Sohn HB, Noh K, Jung C, An JH, Donovan CM, et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis AtMYB44 gene confers drought/salt-stress tolerance in transgenic soybean. Mol Breed. 2012;29: 601–608. doi:10.1007/s11032-011-9576-8
14. Yuan L, Xie GZ, Zhang S, Li B, Wang X, Li Y, et al. GMLCLS negatively regulate ABA perception and signalling genes in soybean leaf dehydration response. Plant Cell Environ. 2021;44: 412–424. doi:10.1111/pce.13931
15. Basu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A. Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Research. 2016;5: 1554. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7678.1
16. Liu F, Jensen CR, Andersen MN. Hydraulic and chemical signals in the control of leaf expansion and stomatal conductance in soybean exposed to drought stress. Funct Plant Biol. 2003;30: 65. doi:10.1071/FP02170
17. Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. ABA‐based chemical signalling: the co‐ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25: 195–210. doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00824.x
18. Mutava RN, Prince SJK, Syed NH, Song L, Valliyodan B, Chen W, et al. Understanding abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms in soybean: A comparative evaluation of soybean response to drought and flooding stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;86: 109–120. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.11.010
19. Silvente S, Sobolev AP, Lara M. Metabolite Adjustments in Drought Tolerant and Sensitive Soybean Genotypes in Response to Water Stress. Yang H, editor. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e38554. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038554
20. Yancey PH. Organic osmolytes as compatible, metabolic and counteracting cytoprotectants in high osmolarity and other stresses. J Exp Biol. 2005;208: 2819–2830. doi:10.1242/jeb.01730
21. Heerden Van PDR, Krüger HJG. Separately and simultaneously induced dark chilling and drought stress effects on photosynthesis, proline accumulation and antioxidant metabolism in soybean. J Plant Physiol. 2002;159: 1077–1086. doi:10.1078/0176-1617-00745
22. Arya H, Singh MB, Bhalla PL. Overexpression of PIF4 affects plant morphology and accelerates reproductive phase transitions in soybean. Food Energy Secur. 2021;10: e291. doi:10.1002/fes3.291
23. Haun W, Coffman A, Clasen BM, Demorest ZL, Lowy A, Ray E, et al. Improved soybean oil quality by targeted mutagenesis of the fatty acid desaturase 2 gene family. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12: 934–940. doi:10.1111/pbi.12201
24. Ngaki MN, Sahoo DK, Wang B, Bhattacharyya MK. Overexpression of a plasma membrane protein generated broad‐spectrum immunity in soybean. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19: 502–516. doi:10.1111/pbi.13479
25. Zhong X, Hong W, Shu Y, Li J, Liu L, Chen X, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene-editing of GmHdz4 transcription factor enhances drought tolerance in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13: 988505. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.988505
26. Park G-R, Bae S-H, Kang B-K, Seo J-H, Oh J-H. Identification of candidate genes for drought tolerance in soybean through QTL mapping and gene expression analysis. Front Genet. 2025;16: 1564160. doi:10.3389/fgene.2025.1564160
27. Wong CE, Singh MB, Bhalla PL. The Dynamics of Soybean Leaf and Shoot Apical Meristem Transcriptome Undergoing Floral Initiation Process. Sun M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e65319. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065319
28. Hussain RM, Ali M, Feng X, Li X. The essence of NAC gene family to the cultivation of drought-resistant soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17: 55. doi:10.1186/s12870-017-1001-y
29. Wei W, Liang D, Bian X, Shen M, Xiao J, Zhang W, et al. GmWRKY54 improves drought tolerance through activating genes in abscisic acid and Ca2+ signaling pathways in transgenic soybean. Plant J. 2019;100: 384–398. doi:10.1111/tpj.14449
30. Hu W, Zhang M, Lu J, Zhang M, He R, Zhu Y, et al. Negative Regulation of GmNAC35 by miR164 Enhances Drought Tolerance in Soybean. Agronomy. 2025;15: 1450. doi:10.3390/agronomy15061450
31. Xu H, Guo Y, Qiu L, Ran Y. Progress in Soybean Genetic Transformation Over the Last Decade. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13: 900318. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.900318
32. Lei Y, Lu L, Liu H-Y, Li S, Xing F, Chen L-L. CRISPR-P: A Web Tool for Synthetic Single-Guide RNA Design of CRISPR-System in Plants. Mol Plant. 2014;7: 1494–1496. doi:10.1093/mp/ssu044
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 A.A. Murodov, M.S. Ayubov, B.O. Mamajonov, A.N. Yusupov, N.Sh. Obidov, Z.X. Bashirxonov, Y.A. Muhammedov (Author)