Abstract
The article examines the phenomenon of language interference in the contemporary discursive representation of Russian verbal art in the Republic of Uzbekistan. The analysis demonstrates that interference manifests at lexical, syntactic, and discursive levels, influencing the interpretation, translation, and reception of Russian literary texts in the Uzbek linguistic environment. Interference is viewed not as an error or deficiency but as a functional phenomenon reflecting bilingual competence, cultural mediation, and post-Soviet linguistic dynamics. Special attention is given to adaptive strategies in translation and discursive transformations that ensure local relevance and cultural acceptability of Russian works.
References
1. Bakhtin M.M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. — Moscow, 1986. — 203 p.
2. Bhabha H. The Location of Culture. — London, 1994. — 285 p.
3. Comrie B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. — Cambridge, 1989. — 252 p.
4. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change. — London, 1995. — 259 p.
5. Fishman J. Reversing Language Shift. — Clevedon, 1991. — 431 p.
6. Gumperz J. Discourse Strategies. — Cambridge, 1982. — 225 p.
7. Halliday M.A.K. Language as Social Semiotic. — London, 1978. — 256 p.
8. Kramsch C. Language and Culture. — Oxford, 1998. — 134 p.
9. Selinker L. Interlanguage. — London, 1972. — 231 p.
10. Toury G. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. — Amsterdam, 1995. — 311 p.
11. Trudgill P. Sociolinguistics. — London, 2000. — 224 p.
12. Vinogradov V.V. Problems of Russian Stylistics. — Moscow, 1980. — 318 p.
13. Weinreich U. Languages in Contact. — The Hague, 1953. — 148 p.
14. Wierzbicka A. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. — Oxford, 1997. — 328 p.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.