Abstract
This study presents a cross-linguistic analysis of scientific discourse, focusing on stylistic and grammatical features in English and Uzbek. The research applies a comparative and descriptive methodology to examine differences in sentence structure, lexical choices, and translation strategies. The findings indicate that English scientific texts prioritize clarity, conciseness, and reader-oriented expression, whereas Uzbek texts demonstrate a higher degree of formalization, nominalization, and explicit logical cohesion. The paper also considers recent trends in global academic writing, including simplification and the influence of digital communication.References
1. Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.
2. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
4. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
5. Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
6. Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. London: Prentice Hall. Komissarov, V. N. (2002). Modern translation studies. Moscow: Higher School.
7. Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Hatim, B., & Munday, J. (2004). Translation: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
9. House, J. (2015). Translation quality assessment: Past and present. London: Routledge.
10. Gotti, M. (2011). Investigating specialized discourse. Bern: Peter Lang. Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English language education. London: Routledge.