Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Mazkur maqolada biologiya fanini o‘qitishda innovatsion o‘quv muhitini loyihalashning pedagogik asoslari hamda ushbu muhitning o‘quvchilarning bilish faolligiga ko‘rsatadigan ta’siri keng yoritilgan. Tadqiqotda zamonaviy ta’lim talablariga mos ravishda muammoli ta’lim, interfaol metodlar, raqamli texnologiyalar, virtual laboratoriyalar va loyiha asosida o‘qitish elementlari integratsiyalashgan o‘quv muhiti ishlab chiqildi. Tajriba-sinov jarayonida innovatsion yondashuv asosida tashkil etilgan darslar o‘quvchilarning mustaqil fikrlash, tahlil qilish, muammo yechish va biologik bilimlarni amaliyotda qo‘llash kompetensiyalarini sezilarli darajada oshirishi aniqlandi. Olingan natijalar biologiya ta’limida innovatsion o‘quv muhitini joriy etish o‘quv jarayonining samaradorligini oshirishda muhim pedagogik omil ekanini tasdiqlaydi
References
1. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.31.1.j463w2107w55x4g1
2. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
3. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
6. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
7. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
8. Slavin, R. E. (2014). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
9. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
11. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
12. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris: OECD Publishing.
13. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.
14. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.