Keywords
ma’no kuchsizlanishi
downtonerlar va hedging birliklari
semantik kontinuum
pragmatika
kognitiv lingvistika
diskurs tahlili
How to Cite
Abstract
Mazkur maqola deintensifikatsiya kategoriyasining lingvistik tabiati va nazariy asoslarini tahlil qilishga bag‘ishlangan. Tadqiqotda ushbu hodisa semantik, kognitiv va pragmatik yondashuvlar asosida kompleks tarzda yoritiladi. Deintensifikatsiya ma’no intensivligining pasayishini ifodalovchi vositalar tizimi sifatida izohlanadi. Maqolada uning leksik (downtonerlar, hedging birliklari), sintaktik (modal konstruktsiyalar) va diskursiv darajalarda namoyon bo‘lish xususiyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Shuningdek, deintensifikatsiyaning kommunikativ-pragmatik funksiyalari, xususan, xushmuomalalik strategiyalari va epistemik ehtiyotkorlikni ifodalashdagi roli ochib beriladiReferences
1. Brown, P., Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 232 p.
2. David Crystal (2003). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 248 p.
3. Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In G. Kaltenböck, W. Mihatsch, S. Schneider (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15- 34). Emerald. 186 p.
4. Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins.
5. George Lakoff (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press 212 p.
6. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press -P. 32-38.
7. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
8. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.