Abstract
This study examines the structural and pragmatic manifestations of prohibitive speech acts in three short stories by Roald Dahl: Lamb to the Slaughter (1953), The Landlady (1959), and Poison (1950). Grounded in Searle’s (1969) Speech Act Theory and Brown and Levinson’s (1987) Politeness Theory, the analysis identifies four principal categories of prohibitive devices: explicit negative imperatives, deontic modal prohibitions, indirect/conversational prohibitions, and self- directed prohibitions. The findings demonstrate that Dahl strategically deploys prohibitive language not merely as a grammatical directive form, but as a mechanism for encoding power asymmetry, psychological manipulation, and narrative irony.References
1. Austin J. L. How to Do Things with Words. - Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962. - p168.
2. Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. - p 345.
3. Dahl R. Kiss Kiss. - New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960. - p369.
4. Dahl R. Someone Like You. - New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953. - p274.
5. Lyons J. Semantics. Vol. 2. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. - p897.
6. Searle J. R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. - p203.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.