LINGUISTIC IMPERIALISM AND THE GLOBAL DOMINANCE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
PDF

Keywords

linguistic imperialism
global English
multilingualism
language

How to Cite

LINGUISTIC IMPERIALISM AND THE GLOBAL DOMINANCE OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. (2026). WORLD OF PHILOLOGY, 5(4), 85-88. https://doi.org/10.70728/phil.v05.i04.016

Abstract

The global dominance of English has become a defining feature of contemporary globalization, shaping academic discourse, economic participation, and cross-cultural communication. However, this dominance is not ideologically neutral; it reflects historically embedded power relations and continues to reproduce structural inequalities. This study critically examines the phenomenon of linguistic imperialism in relation to the global spread of English, integrating classical theoretical perspectives with recent empirical research (2020-2025). Employing a qualitative, literature-based methodology and critical discourse analysis, the paper explores how English maintains hegemonic status through institutional policies, digital infrastructures, and global knowledge production systems. The findings indicate that while English functions as a necessary lingua franca facilitating global mobility and information exchange, it simultaneously contributes to linguistic marginalization, epistemic inequality, and cultural homogenization. The study argues that contemporary linguistic imperialism operates in subtle, systemic ways, particularly through education systems and digital platforms. The article concludes by advocating for decolonial and multilingual language policies that balance global communicative efficiency with linguistic justice and cultural sustainability.
PDF

References

1. Block, D., Gray, J., Holborow, M. (2020). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. Routledge.

2. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

3. De Costa, P. I., Park, J. S. Y., Wee, L. (2022). Linguistic imperialism: Still a valid construct in a globalized world? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(5), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1730382

4. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

5. Flores, N. (2020). From academic language to language architecture: Challenging racio-linguistic ideologies. Theory Into Practice, 59(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.