Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has introduced innovative approaches to teaching and learning, particularly in the field of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). This study investigates the effectiveness of AI- based technologies in enhancing language acquisition, focusing on their impact on learners’ linguistic competence, motivation, and autonomy. The paper explores various AI tools, including intelligent tutoring systems, chatbots, speech recognition software, and automated writing evaluation platforms. It also evaluates both the pedagogical benefits and the potential limitations of AI implementation in EFL contexts. The findings indicate that AI significantly contributes to personalized learning, immediate feedback, and increased engagement. However, concerns regarding reduced human interaction, ethical considerations, and technological dependency remain critical. The study concludes that AI is most effective when integrated with traditional teaching methodologies in a balanced and pedagogically sound manner.References
1. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
2. Luckin, R. (2018). Machine Learning and Human Intelligence: The Future of Education for the 21st Century. London: UCL Institute of Education Press.
3. Chen, X., Xie, H., Hwang, G. J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology Society, 23(2), 1-15.
4. Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Emerging technologies: Artificial intelligence and language learning. Language Learning Technology, 23(3), 1-10.
5. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning and artificial intelligence. ReCALL, 32(2), 1-15.
6. Li, K., Wang, S. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in language education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(6), 1- 25.
7. Zhao, Y. (2022). AI and the future of language learning. Computers and Education, 180, 104-120.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.