SEMANTIC AND LINGUOCULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEXICAL COMPONENT “TIME” IN ENGLISH AND ITS UZBEK EQUIVALENTS
PDF

Keywords

time
semantics
polysemy
temporal concept
conceptual metaphor
linguoculturology
cognitive linguistics
translation studies
English language
Uzbek

How to Cite

SEMANTIC AND LINGUOCULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LEXICAL COMPONENT “TIME” IN ENGLISH AND ITS UZBEK EQUIVALENTS. (2026). WORLD OF PHILOLOGY, 5(6), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.70728/phil.v05.i06.035

Abstract

The present study investigates the semantic and linguocultural characteristics of the lexical component time in English and its Uzbek equivalents vaqt, zamon, davr, and palla. The research focuses on the polysemantic structure of the lexeme, its literal and figurative meanings, metaphorical extensions, and conceptual representations in English and Uzbek linguistic worldviews. The study is based on semantic, componential, comparative, cognitive, and linguocultural approaches. Particular attention is paid to the conceptualization of time as a culturally conditioned phenomenon reflected in language. The findings indicate that the semantic field of the English lexeme time is distributed among several lexical units in Uzbek, each of which represents specific conceptual and cultural dimensions. The research contributes to contemporary studies in semantics, cognitive linguistics, translation studies, and linguoculturology.
PDF

References

1. Allan, K. (2016). The Meaning of Language. London: Routledge.

2. Boroditsky, L. (2011). How Languages Construct Time. Scientific American, 304(2), 62-65.

3. Cruse, D. A. (2011). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Dirven, R., Verspoor, M. (2004). Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

5. Evans, V. (2009). How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning Construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

6. Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 20-32.

7. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

8. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11. Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.