Abstract
Ushbu maqolada o‘zbek tilida raqamli kommunikatsiya muhiti ta’sirida frazeologik birliklar semantikasida yuz berayotgan transformatsion jarayonlar tahlil qilinadi. Internet, ijtimoiy tarmoqlar, messenjerlar hamda multimedia platformalarida shakllanayotgan yangi muloqot modeli frazeologik birliklarning ma’no tuzilishi, pragmatik funksiyasi va ekspressiv imkoniyatlariga sezilarli ta’sir ko‘rsatmoqda. Tadqiqot davomida zamonaviy o‘zbek internet diskursidan olingan frazeologik birliklar semantik, pragmatik va kontekstual tahlil metodlari asosida o‘rganildi. Shuningdek, raqamli kommunikatsiya sharoitida kuzatilayotgan metaforik kengayish, semantik torayish, ironizatsiya, memlashuv hamda emoji va vizual belgilar bilan integratsiyalashuv kabi hodisalar tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, an’anaviy frazeologizmlar raqamli kommunikatsiya ta’sirida yangi ma’no qirralarini hosil qilmoqda, ularning pragmatik vazifalari esa kommunikativ vaziyatga mos ravishda o‘zgarib bormoqda. Ayrim frazeologik birliklar internet madaniyatining ta’sirida ikkilamchi semantik qatlamlarga ega bo‘lib, yangi diskursiv funksiyalarni bajarmoqda. Mazkur tadqiqot natijalari o‘zbek internet lingvistikasi, zamonaviy frazeologiya hamda raqamli diskurs tadqiqotlarini rivojlantirishga xizmat qiladi va frazeologik semantikaning dinamik tabiati haqidagi ilmiy qarashlarni boyitadi.References
1. Телия В. Н. Русская фразеология: семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. - М.: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1996. - 288 с.
2. Мокиенко В. М. Славянская фразеология. - М.: Высшая школа, 2005. - 408 с.
3. Кунин А. В. Курс фразеологии современного английского языка. - 2-е изд., перераб. - М.: Высшая школа, 1996. - 381 с.
4. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
5. Crystal D. Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. London: Routledge, 2011.
6. Herring S. C. Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, Reconfigured, and Emergent // Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013. P. 1-25.
7. Herring S. C., Stein D., Virtanen T. (Eds.). Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013.
8. Добросклонская Т. Г. Медиалингвистика: системный подход к изучению языка СМИ. - М.: Флинта, 2020.
9. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
10. Burger H. Phraseology: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
11. Langlotz A. Idiomatic Creativity: A Cognitive-Linguistic Model of Idiom Representation and Idiom Variation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2006.
12. Fernando C. Idioms and Idiomaticity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
13. Naciscione A. Stylistic Use of Phraseological Units in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010.
14. Wray A. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
15. van Dijk T. A. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
16. Fairclough N. Language and Power. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2015.
17. Gee J. P. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2014.
18. Zappavigna M. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.
19. Tagg C. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge, 2015.
20. Yus F. Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2011.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.