Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Maqolada oliy ta'lim talabalarining kognitiv kompetensiyalarini multimediya vositalari asosida rivojlantirish metodikasining mazmuni, tarkibi va texnologik ta'minoti TPACK (texnologik, pedagogik va mazmuniy bilim integratsiyasi) modeli asosida ilmiy-nazariy jihatdan asoslanadi. Muallif metodikani to'rt komponentdan (maqsadli, mazmuniy, protsessual-texnologik, natijaviy) iborat yaxlit tizim sifatida tavsiflaydi va uning texnologik o'zagini TPACK modeli hamda kognitiv yuklama nazariyasi tamoyillari tashkil etishini ko'rsatadi. Multimediya vositalarini kognitiv faollik darajalariga muvofiq tabaqalashtirish yondashuvi, topshiriqlarning uch turli tipologiyasi, vositalarni tanlash algoritmi va o'quv materiallarini sifatli loyihalash mezonlari taklif etiladi. Tadqiqot natijalari oliy ta'lim muassasalarida elektron o'quv resurslari va multimediali didaktik majmualarni ilmiy asosda loyihalashda foydalanilishi mumkin. Kalit so ‘zlar: kognitiv kompetensiya, metodika, TPACK modeli, multimediya, kognitiv yuklama nazariyasi, texnologik ta'minot, kognitiv faollik darajalari, didaktik loyihalash, oliy ta'limReferences
1. O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti. (2019). Oliy ta'lim tizimini 2030 yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to'g'risidagi Farmoni (PF-5847-son, 2019-yil 8- oktabr). Lex.uz.
2. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
3. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
4. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
5. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
6. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
7. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
8. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
10. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
11. Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.
12. Muslimov, N. A. (2013). Bo'lajak kasb ta'limi o'qituvchilarini kasbiy shakllantirish metodikasi. Fan.
13. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. ASCD.
14. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.
15. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.
16. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.